Effect of Various Pasteurization Temperatures on Bacteria Growth


PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the spoilage rate of non-pasteurized, pasteurized, and ultra-pasteurized milk at two different temperatures.

I became interested in this idea when I read an article about milk and then talked to an Inland Northwest Dairies employee about how they keep milk from spoiling.

The information gained from this experiment could help society by showing parents, restaurant owners, food service managers in schools or hospitals, and consumers what kind of milk will last for the longest time at various temperatures.


Various Pasteurization Temperatures on Bacteria Growth

HYPOTHESIS

My first hypothesis was that ultra-pasteurized milk would last longer than pasteurized at room temperature. 

My second hypothesis was that pasteurized milk would last longer than non-pasteurized milk at room temperature.

My third hypothesis was that milk of all types would spoil more quickly at warmer temperatures.

I based my hypothesis on a statement by an Inland Northwest Dairies employee, Ron Underwood. “The higher the temperature the milk is pasteurized at, the longer it will last.” 

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:
  • The amount of milk tested.
  • The containers the milk is kept in.
  • The temperature the milk is kept in.
  • The percent of fat in milk.
  • The brand of milk tested.
  • Where the milk is tested.
  • How the milk is tested for spoilage.
  • Types of vials the milk is tested in.
The manipulated variable was the kind of milk tested.

The responding variable was the amount of bacteria in the milk. 

To measure the responding variable I will count the bacteria.


MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
4 pints
Non-pasteurized milk
10 pints
Pasteurized milk
10 pints
Ultra-pasteurized milk
1
1 ml. pipette
25
Pipes for pipette
1
Colony counter (Magnifier for counting colonies)
24
Petri Dishes
1
Jar of agar



PROCEDURES

1. Get non-pasteurized milk.

2. Get pasteurized milk

3. Get ultra-pasteurized milk.

4. Sterilize the pasteurized milk using sterilized water.

5. Put one milliliter of non-pasteurized milk into the plate with one-milliliter pipette. Throw away the disposable plastic pipe.

6. Put one milliliter of pasteurized milk that has been kept in a refrigerator in the plate with your one-milliliter pipette. Throw away the disposable plastic pipe.

7. Put one milliliter of ultra-pasteurized milk that has been refrigerated in the plate with one-milliliter pipette. Throw away the disposable plastic pipe.

8. Pour in the agar (just enough so that the bottom is completely covered).

9. Mix the milk by gently swirling the plate slowly (with the lid closed) and let the milk and the agar mix.

10. Place in an incubator at thirty-two degrees Fahrenheit.

11. Put one milliliter of non-pasteurized milk that has been kept at 60 degrees Fahrenheit using your 1-milliliter pipette. Throw away your disposable plastic pipe. 

12. Put one milliliter of pasteurized milk that has been kept at 60 degrees Fahrenheit using your 1-milliliter pipette. Throw away your disposable plastic pipe.

13. Put one milliliters of ultra-pasteurized milk that has been kept at 60 degrees Fahrenheit using your 1-milliliter pipette. Throw away your disposable plastic pipe.

14. Repeat steps 8-10.

15. Do steps 4-10 using one-tenth milliliter pipettes and 4,11-14 using one tenth. 

16. Repeat steps one through 15 three times again. 

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the spoilage rate of non-pasteurized, pasteurized, and ultra-pasteurized milk at two different temperatures.

The results of the experiment were that all types of milk grew more bacteria colonies in warmer temperature, except the ultra-pasteurized milk, which grew no colonies at all. 


CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was that ultra-pasteurized milk would last longer than pasteurized at room temperature. My second hypothesis was that pasteurized milk would last longer than non-pasteurized milk at room temperature. My third hypothesis was that milk of all types would spoil more quickly at warmer temperatures. 

The results indicate that my first hypothesis should be accepted because the ultra-pasteurized milk had less bacteria colonies than the pasteurized. My second hypothesis should be accepted because the pasteurized had less colonies than non-pasteurized milk. My third hypothesis should be accepted because all types of milk grew more colonies at room temperature. 

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder how long it would take for the ultra-pasteurized milk to grow colonies, since it grew none in a week at either temperature. 

If I were to conduct this project again I would do longer trials, conduct more trials, and do more research about why bacteria makes food spoil or why it grows. I would also find out what kind of bacteria grew.

Researched by   -- Michelle U


Read More

Effect of Heating vs Freezing on The Survival Rate of Bacteria


PURPOSE

 
The purpose of this experiment was to determine which heating or freezing temperature is a better method to kill bacteria. 

I became interested in this idea when I froze bacteria at extreme temperatures last year and wondered whether heating or freezing would kill more bacteria because freezing bacteria was a very effective way to either slow down the growth rate or kill bacteria at extreme temperatures such as –60∞C.

 The information gained from this experiment could help scientists and doctors understand how freezing or heating bacteria can be helpful.

The Survival Rate of Bacteria


HYPOTHESIS

My first hypothesis was that the highest heating temperature would kill more bacteria than lower heating temperatures.

 My second hypothesis was that the lowest freezing temperature would kill more bacteria of each type than less extreme freezing temperatures.

I based my second hypothesis on the results of my experiment from last year, although I tested only Staph and E. coli.


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

 The testing procedure

 The time the bacteria was frozen and heated

 The amount of bacteria 

The way they were measured after freezing and heating


The four types of bacteria


 The vials the bacteria were in


 The temperatures of the refrigerators were always –20°, -30°, and -60°  Celsius


 The heating temperatures were always 5°, 35°, and 40° Celsius 

     
The manipulated variable was the freezing and heating temperatures during storage.

The responding variable was the survival rate.


To measure the responding variable, I counted the bacteria colonies. 


MATERIALS
                   
QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
20 micro liters
Escherichia Coli
20 micro liters
Staphylococcus Aureus
20 micro liters
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
20 micro liters
Straptococcus Agalactiae
Lots 
Cotton Swabs
Lots 
Disposable Pipette Tips
Lots 
Sterile Saline solution
120
Test Tubes
120 
Blood Agar Plates
120 
Inoculating Loops
1        
10 Micro liter Pipette
1
200 Micro liter Pipette
1
Colorimeter (turbidity meter)
1
Lab Coat


                                                          PROCEDURES

1.  On day  obtain the following bacteria from hospital lab.

  • Escherichia Coli
  • Staphylococcus Aureus
  • Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
  • Streptococcus Agalactiae
2. Next, make 80% turbidity suspension in sterile saline solution for each bacteria type.

3. Divide one solution of bacteria between 30 vials, with 200 micro-liters per vial.

4. Select five of these vials and label them with the name of the bacteria, the temperature of storage, and the vial number.  This is an example for Staphylococcus Aureus at 35° C.:  SAU V.1 35°, SAU V.2 35°, SAU V.3 35°, SAU V.4 35°, SAU V.5 35°

5. Repeat steps 3-4 with all the bacteria and all temperatures.  

6. Store bacteria labeled 5°, 35°, and 40° at those Celsius temperatures.

7. Store bacteria labeled –60°, -30°, and –20° C. at those temperatures.

8. On day one, take all vials marked “V.1” out and let them sit for 10 min. at room temperatures.

9. Refreeze or reheat all these vials where they belong.

10. On day two take out all V.1 and V.2 vials, and let them sit for 10 min. at room temperature.

11. Refreeze or reheat all these vials where they belong.

12. Repeat steps 8-9 for three more days and additionally removing V.3 on the third day, V.4 on the fourth, and finally V.5 on the last day.

13. On day 6, pipette 10 micro-liters from each vial to its own blood agar plate. 

14. Spread the bacteria with inoculating loop over the surface of the blood agar plate.  Label plates exactly as the vials were labeled.

15. Incubate bacteria overnight at 37° Celsius.

16. Remove plates from incubator.

17. Do a colony count for each plate under fluorescent light using the unaided eye. Record this number.

18. Destroy all bacteria on equipment contaminated with bacteria in autoclave-using hospital’s procedures.


                                                           RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine whether heating or freezing is a better method to kill bacteria. 

The results of the experiment were that the bacteria that was frozen had way more bacteria than the ones put in 35∞ and 40∞ heaters.

 
CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was that the highest heating temperature would kill more bacteria than lower heating temperatures. 

My second hypothesis was that the lowest freezing temperature would kill more bacteria of each type than less extreme freezing temperatures.

 The results indicate that both hypothesis should be should be accepted. 

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if time affects the number of bacteria.

 If I were to conduct this project again I would freeze and heat the bacteria longer than five days.

Researched by - Welson L




Read More

Effect of Anhydrous Ammonia on the Dehydration Rate of Plant vs. Animals Cell

  
PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the dehydration rate of plant and animal cells exposed to anhydrous ammonia.

I became interested in this idea when a Yakima County Sheriff’s Department drug detective showed me money that had been dehydrated by anhydrous ammonia.

The information gained from this experiment could help people preserve food. Also it will help with food transportation because dehydration cuts down the weight by taking away the moisture.  This could also help space travel.

                                                   HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that the animal cells would dehydrate more completely and faster than the plant cells.

I based my hypothesis on an Internet site of Florida State University that said, “plant cells have a rigid wall surrounding the plasma membrane” it also said that “animal cells don’t have a cell wall.” This means that the plant cell has a harder outside with the rigid cell wall and the animal cell doesn’t, so it should be easier to take all the moisture out.


                                            EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:
  • Anhydrous ammonia
  • Temperature
  • Size
  • Time
  • Brand of plastic sandwich bag

The manipulated variable was the different types of food being dehydrated.

The responding variable was the weight of the cells after being dehydrated.

To measure the responding variable I used a digital scale calibrated in grams. 


MATERIALS


QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
2
Steaks
2
Pork chops
2
Chickens
2
Apples
2
Oranges
2
Celery
2
Broccoli
1
Triple Beam Balance
1
Ruler
1
Knife
3 Pints
Anhydrous Ammonia
1 Box
Plastic Sandwich Bags
1
Sink
1
Wooden Spoon
1
Pot
1
Strainer
1
Tongs


  
PROCEDURES

1. Prepare foods for drying

a) Clean and dry
b) Slice food into 2 by 2 by 8 cm strips
c) Store in a sandwich bag and record weight
d) Repeat until all food has been weighed 
e) For the orange take off peel

2. Find a well ventilated area

3. Put 250ml of anhydrous ammonia into the metal pot

4. Put the three pieces of beef into the same pot

5. Stir and mix the food and ammonia around with the wooden spoon

6. Take out using the tongs and/or wooden spoon

7. Put the dehydrated food back in plastic bag

8. Get new anhydrous ammonia (250ml)

9. Repeat steps 4-8 using the other foods

10. Continue until all food has been dehydrated

11. Dispose all anhydrous ammonia in a well ventilated area

12. Record new weights

                                                                RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the dehydration rate of plant and animal cells exposed to anhydrous ammonia.

The results of the experiment were that the anhydrous ammonia dehydrated the animal cells the most with a total of 13.75 and the plant cells the least with a total of 12.25.

 
CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that the animal cells would dehydrate more completely and faster than the plant cells.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted.

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if different types of plant and animal products would dehydrate in a similar manner.

If I were to conduct this project again I would have conducted more trials and would have used more types of food.  


Researched -  Brooke S. 


Read More
Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us
Copyright © 2017 www.sciencefairprojects.in | All Rights Reserved. Design By Templateclue