Effect of Acid Rain on the Biomass of Radishes


   

PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of acid rain on the biomass of radishes.

I became interested in this idea when my family started to plant a garden. We watered, fertilized and weeded the plants. Not all of the plants grew. They died within a week or two. I wonder it could have been caused by acid rain. My parents also told me once how the rain may be affecting the crops. They told me about some chemicals that get in rain.

The information gained from this experiment could help gardeners and farmers with their crops. It could also help warn those who might contribute to acid rain, such as, factories, truck-drivers, and others who drive a automobiles.


HYPOTHESIS

My first hypothesis was that the plant’s biomass would be less as the water pH decreased (became more acidic). 

My second hypothesis was that the survival rate of the radishes would decrease as the pH decreased.

I based my hypotheses on a book “Acid Rain” by Gail B. Stewart.  It stated, “In the last twenty years, rain has been associated with other, less pleasant ideas. Scientist, especially those who study the environment, has found that not all rain and snow are pure. In whatever form, much of the water that comes from the sky is laced with deadly chemicals that turn into acid. The acid builds up in lakes and rivers. It kills the fish and insects that live in the water. Acid rain has also damaged many of our forests. It is harmful to some crops. There is also more and more evidence that acid rain is hazardous to human beings.”


                                                EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

•    The number of radishes in each group (36).

•    Number of seeds in each cell (2).

•    The amount of liquid given to each plant.

•    When each plant is watered when needed.

•    The depth the seed is planted in the soil (1 cm).

•    The distance each light is from the ground (30cm).

•    The amount of time each plant gets light (14 hr 6:00am-8:00pm).

•    The temperature each plant grows at (76ºf, 24°c). 

The manipulated variable was the pH level in the water given to the different groups of plants.

The responding variable was the plant growth (mass) of the radishes.

To measure the responding variable, I used a triple beam balance to weigh the plants after they were uprooted.

    
MATERIALS
QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
288
Early Scarlet GLobe radish seeds used (144 for experiment)
4
Syringes (12 ml)
2
"Easy Grow" planters (72 cells)
2
Bags of potting soil
2
Fluoresent Lights and fictures
1
Triple beam balance
1
Greenhouse (L76cmx W601cmx H86cm)
4
Plastic bottles
4
paper bowls
Light Timer
Pencil marked at 1 cm


                                                             PROCEDURES

I.    Prepare soil in planting containers

A    Put enough soil in each planter cell, evenly, so that each cell has soil      up to the top.

B    Shake planter and tamp it on a counter so that the soil is loosely packed.

C    Sprinkle more soil on the cells so that there is soil until the planter cells are filled to the rim.

D    Put water in a paper bowl and pour water in each cell. Water each planter cell individually, so they are slightly soaked.

E    Repeat this step if soil is not fully wet.

F    Add more soil until cell is filled to the rim of the planter.

G    Repeat steps above for the other trays that you may have.

II.    Plant Radish seeds in planter

A    Mark a pencil 1cm from the tip.

B    Make 2 small holes in soil diagonal from each other to the 1 cm mark.

C    Put 1 seed in each hole.

D    Put each seed into its hole, 1cm deep.

E    Cover the seeds and pat the dirt lightly onto the seeds.
           
III.    Water the plants

A    Check the bottom tray for water.

B    Check the soil and see if it is dry 

C    Always water every cell with the same amount and at the same time (depending on how much they need).

IV.    Mixing the pH levels  

A    Ask a local laboratory to mix 4 different water pH levels.

B    They used distilled water (H2O) and added sulfuric acid (H2SO4) to make different levels of acid rain.

C    They made pH levels 6.0, 5.0, 4.0, and 3.0 and labeled them.

D    Label groups of 36 plants as “6.0,” “5.0,” “4.0,” and “3.0”.

V.    Treat plants with pH levels

A    Repeat the step three of watering the plants except.

While giving the plants toxins check on them daily for: Health, Growth, Color changes, and Leaves.

VI.    Measure Plants for Biomass:

A    Pull each radish plant carefully out of its planter cell and remove dirt.

B    Weigh all plants from group together on Triple Beam Balance 

C    Count plants in this group and divide the mass by the number of plants to get the average.

D    Repeat these steps until each group has been done.


RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of acid rain on the biomass of radishes.

The results of the experiment were that the pH level of 6.0 groups was the healthiest group in biomass by a large amount and the group 5.0’s biomass was the least. The pH level of 6.0’s group biomass averages are 0.27g. 5.0’s were 0.23g. 4.0’s were 0.25g. 3.0’s were 0.24g.

 
   
CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was that the plant’s biomass would be less as the water pH decreased (became more acidic). 

The results indicate that the overall pattern was for plant mass to decrease as pH decreased. However one group, the 5.0 pH group, did not follow the pattern and had the smallest average biomass. For this reason, my first hypothesis should be rejected, until more research is done. 

My second hypothesis was that the survival rate of the radishes would decrease as the pH decreased. 

The results also indicated that my 2nd hypothesis should be rejected because all the groups survived at an equal rate. 

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder how acid rain would affect different plant species such as soybeans or tomatoes.

If I were to conduct this project again I would do several things differently. I would have used 2-3 times more plants. I would have used a more accurate scale so that I would have more accurate results. I also would have tested my seeds before planting to make sure the germination rate was near 100%. I also would have grown them in the sunlight in late spring.



Researched by -  Kaitlin B


Read More

Effect of Football Helmet Padding Pressure on the Effect of Force of Impact


PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine if air pressure in a football helmet’s padding affects the force of impact. 

I became interested in this idea after the football team I played on had won our championship game. I wondered if playing football that season had made any effect on my brain, good or bad.


The information gained from this experiment could possibly be helpful for football players and coaches in all different leagues, letting them know the effect their helmet has on possible brain injury.


Effect of Football Helmet Padding


HYPOTHESIS
My first hypothesis was that the impact force would decrease as air pressure inside the padding increased from 0 mm Hg (totally empty) up to 200 mm Hg (maximum tested). 

My second hypothesis was that the impact force would increase as air pressure inside the padding increased above 75 mm Hg.

I based my hypothesis on the answer my football coach gave to the question, “Is the air pressure in the padding for comfort or for fit?” My coach answered, “It is for both. It depends on what the player wants. Some people like it as pumped up as they can get it, other like it as empty as possible.”


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were: the helmet being tested, size of mannequin head, way tested, force/speed of helmet at impact, the temperature at which the experiment was conducted, the measure being used, accelerometer probe being used, and the software that read the probe.

The manipulated variable was the pressure in the football helmet.

The responding variable was “g” force or force of impact.

To measure the responding variable I used a Vernier Accelerometer probe attached to a computer running Logger Pro 3.0 software, which reads “g” force of the impact/ collision 

MATERIALS


QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
Vernier accelerometer probe
1
computer running Logger Pro 3.0 software
2
football helmet
1
hand pump (off of a blood pressure cuff)
1
pulley
1
Mannequin head
25
Feet of 1/8inch rope
1
roll of masking tape



 PROCEDURES
1. Tie a rope securely to the base of the pulley.

2. Pass the rope over a strong support 3 meters above floor.  Pull the rope so the pulley is positioned securely about 3 meters above the floor.  

3. Take a helmet and tie it to a second rope.

4. Run this rope though the pulley so the weight can be raised and lowered easily.

5. Attach the Vernier accelerometer probe to the computer with Logger Pro software.

6. Place the Vernier accelerometer probe inside the mannequin head shape by drilling a hole in the top of it and stuffing the probe inside of the hole.

7. Using bulb pump from a sphygmomanometer attached to a sports ball needle, add air to the internal protective pad in the football helmet.  The pressure should read 0 mm Hg.

8. Put the mannequin head shape into the helmet in an upright position on a flat surface that the masking tape can fasten the mannequin head into a position where it is not tilted or uneven when it is placed on the flat surface. 

9. Be sure it is positioned exactly under the other helmet.

10. Check helmet for correct fit.

11. Hold the rope so the helmet is in a fixed position, suspended 2.0 meters in the air directly above the helmet with the mannequin head. The empty helmet must not be swinging.  

12. Release the rope so the weight will hit the helmet and mannequin head. 

13. Record what the Vernier accelerometer probe reads in “meters per second squared” for that individual helmet brand at the moment of impact.

14. Repeat steps 10-13 for a total of 10 trials.  

15. Repeat steps 8-14 for each pad pressure.

  
RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine if air pressure in a football helmet’s padding affects the force of impact.

The results of the experiment showed that the impact impulse raised as the air pressure inside the helmet increased. The maximum impact was similar on average for all pressure levels. 


                                                          CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was that the impact force would decrease as air pressure inside the padding increased from 0 mm Hg (totally empty) up to 200 mm Hg (maximum tested).

My second hypothesis was that the impact force would increase as air pressure inside the padding increased above 75 mm Hg. 

The results indicate that my first hypothesis should be rejected. 

The results indicate that my second hypothesis should be accepted.

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if not having the padding in the helmet helps with the impact force.

If I were to conduct this project again I would b sure to do so in a more controlled manor. I also would find a something different do set the probe into instead of using a Styrofoam mannequin head. I believe that the Styrofoam head had a bad affect on the results of this experiment.



Researched by -- Camdon A


Read More

Comparing the Lead Content of Drinking Water in Various Schools


 PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the amount of lead in school drinking water at different schools within the Selah School District.

I became interested in this idea when I read online that lead was very harmful to human health. I felt this was a very important issue to study.

The information gained from this experiment could affect future school district decisions greatly. It could also help increase our water purity and decrease harm to students and staff.


Lead Content of Drinking Water

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was the older the school, the more lead in the drinking water.

I based my hypothesis on a statement made by Norm Hepner, a Washington State Department of Ecology Engineer. He said, “I think the older a school is, the more lead there will be in the drinking water.”


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were: 
  • Amount of water tested in each sample
  • Containers used to collect and store samples
  • Method of measuring lead
  • Equipment used
  • Week day of sample
  • Time of day
The manipulated variable was the school location where samples were taken.

The responding variable was amount of lead in the drinking water. 

To measure the responding variable the samples were analyzed in a professional laboratory using Standard Method 200.9 technique. I took the results and averaged the data for each school.


MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
40
sample containers
1
permanent marker
4
school maps (2 for each school)
1
watch


PROCEDURES

1. Travel to the school

 2. Flush the pipes the evening before samples are taken

 a) Note: the water cannot sit less 8 hours and no more than 18 hours in the pipes             
                                      
           b) The water must run for 30 seconds

3. Go to a drinking fountain

     a) Make sure the water is not taken from a water cooler or filter
4. On the container put the following on the sample blank spaces:

     a) In the I.D. space: The location and school initials

     b) In the client space: The school district

     c) Time

     d) Date

5. Take the container and collect water from the water fountain

6. Repeat steps 2-5 many times using all water fountains

7. Repeat steps 1-6 at the next school

8. Send the samples to a professional laboratory

9. Samples will be handed back with the results

10. Average all samples for each school

11. Analyze the results

RESULTS


The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the amount of lead in school drinking water at different schools within the Selah School District.

The results of the experiment were, Sunset, the oldest building, had the least amount of lead, 0.002 parts per million (ppm). The newest school, Selah Intermediate School, had 0.006 ppm, the most amount of lead. Lince had 0.003 ppm, and John Campbell had 0.005 ppm.

 
CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was the older the school, the more lead in the drinking water.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected because the amount of lead varied at different schools.

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if the amount of lead in soil affects the amount of lead in the runoff water. Also, does the amount of lead in irrigation water affect the amount of lead in the soil. Does the water temperature affect the amount of lead dissolved in domestic water?

If I were to conduct this project again, I would have taken more samples per school. I would have compared the lead in all the different schools. Maybe I would have compared Selah school district to another school district.


Researched by --- Rainan V.


Read More
Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us
Copyright © 2017 www.sciencefairprojects.in | All Rights Reserved. Design By Templateclue