Total Suspended Solids in Wastewater before and after Treatment




  
PURPOSE

The first purpose of this experiment was to compare the water clarity (total suspended solids) before and after wastewater treatment.

The second purpose of this experiment was to compare the treated water clarity (total suspended solids) after treatment to that of the river water it would flow into.

I became interested in this idea when I learned of the different amounts of inorganic and organic solids that flow from every household into a sewer. I was interested in how the clarity of the water changed from the initial discharge of washing machines, dishwashers, and toilets as compared to what goes into the river. 

The information gained from this experiment could help people understand that wastewater treatment must be carefully monitored to avoid negative impact in the river it flows into. 


HYPOTHESIS

My first hypothesis was the percent reduction of the total suspended solids of untreated wastewater to that of the treated wastewater would be 85% or greater.  

I based my first hypothesis on the City of Selah Wastewater Treatment Plant N.P.D.E.S. permit issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology. Specifically, the percentage of reduction must be 85% or greater. In addition the weekly average for suspended solids cannot exceed 45 mg/L and the monthly average cannot exceed 30 mg/L.

My second hypothesis was that the treated wastewater would have a total suspended solids content that was no more than 50% greater than the Yakima River upstream of the wastewater entry point.

I based this hypothesis on the fact that the clarification process within the Selah Wastewater Treatment plant was designed to produce total suspended solids content close to that of the Yakima River just upstream of the wastewater entry point via the Selah ditch.  It is also known that both river water and treatment plant effluent vary quite a bit from week to week due to rain, run-off from the mountains, and numerous other events.


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were: 

v     The untreated (Influent) sampling point.
v     The treated (Effluent) sampling point.
v     The River (upstream) sampling point.
v     The testing equipment
v     The testing procedures
v     The Drying oven temperature (103 – 105 degrees C)
v     The muffle furnace (505 degrees C)
v     The grab samples collection time.
v     The volume of grab sample collected at each point. (1 Liter)
v    Quality Control standard for total suspended solids which will be run with each set of   tests  
  •     Celite 521.
  •     Weight Scale for solids.
  •     Filters – Whatman 934 AH 55mm diameter
  •     Distilled water for rinse.

The manipulated variable was location of sampling.

-    Influent 

-    Effluent

-    Upstream 

The responding variable was the total suspended solids.

To measure the responding variable:  I used the equipment at the Selah Wastewater treatment plant Lab along with procedures found in the Book of Standard Methods 20th Edition to determine the mass of suspended solids in each sample. 

MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
3 gallons         
Distilled water
1  
10 ml. pipette for Influent sample
Vacuum pump
100 ml. cylinder for effluent sample
1  
100 ml. cylinder for River sample
Suction flask
11 
Filters – Whatman 934 AH
11 
Aluminum weight dishes
1
Desiccator with desiccant containing color
 Indicator for moisture concentration
1
Filter holder and adapter
1
Drying oven 103 – 105 degrees C
1
Muffle furnace 550 degrees C
3   
Calibration Weights
1
Wax paper
1
Tweezers
1
100 ml. cylinder for standard Celite 521
1
50 ml. cylinder
1 liter flask for standard Celite 521
1
100 ml. cylinder for reagent grade water check
1
Safety glasses
1 liter sample containers
12 pair        
Pair of nitrile gloves
Scale 0.1-mg capability
300mg
Celite 521 Total suspended solids standard
Lab coat
1
Wash area with soap and antibacterial lotion
1
Clean work area

                            
PROCEDURES

A.    Make sure safety items are in place and being used.

B.    Prepare 11 glass fiber filters (whatman 934 AH) 1 filter for distilled water check, 3 filters for Influent replicates, 3 filters for Effluent replicates, 3 filters for River replicates, 1 filter for Quality control check.

1.    Insert glass fiber filter disk (Whatman 934 AH) into filtration apparatus with the wrinkled side up. 

2.    Turn on Vacuum Pump. Rinse filter three times with each containing 20 ml. of reagent – grade distilled water. 

3.    Turn off Vacuum Pump and remove filter with tweezers from the filtration apparatus and place in Aluminum weight tin.

4.     Place tin containing filter in the drying oven for 1 hour, at a temperature of 103 – 105 degrees C. 

5.    Place Tin containing filter in muffle furnace at 550 degrees C for 15 minutes. 

6.    Place Tin containing filter in desiccator to balance the temperature. The filter weight should be weighed a few times to ensure not more than a 4% change between previous weight. This is to make sure the filter is now ready for use.

C.    Conduct the reagent grade distilled water check.

1.    Calibrate scale with calibration weight 

2.    Weigh up 1 of the 11 filters.

3.    Place filter on filtration apparatus.

4.    Turn on Vacuum Pump.

5.    Use 100 ml. of reagent grade distilled water and pour over filter.

6.    Dry and weigh filter

a.    Let run through filter fully. 

b.    Turn off vacuum pump.

c.    Remove filter from filtration apparatus 

d.    Place filter in aluminum tin.

e.    Place tin containing filter in drying oven for 1 hour at 103 – 105 degrees C.

f.    Take out of Drying oven and place in desiccator until temperature is balanced. Usually 20 minutes.

g.    Calibrate scale again with calibration weights 

h.    Take filter out of desiccator and remove from tin. Tare scale.

i.    Place filter on scale and record weight in grams. Remove filter, tare scale, and re-weigh to ensure less than a 4% change from previous weight. 

j.    Place filter in desiccator between weights.

7.    Filter should have same weight in grams or no change with the reagent grade-water. This is a quality check for reagent grade water, procedures, and equipment.

8.    Calculation:

a.    Weight of filter and residue after drying.

b.    Tare weight of washed filter.

c.    Sample size of 100 ml.

d.    [(A-B) * 1,000,000] / C = Total suspended solids.

D.    Conduct Quality Control Check using Celite 521 Total suspended solids Standard to check procedures in weight and measures.

1.    Calibrate scale with calibration weights.

2.    Place wax paper on scale and tare the scale.

3.    Place 75mg of Celite 521 on wax paper. Weigh out on scale.

4.    Transfer 75mg of Celite 521 to 1 liter flask filled halfway with reagent grade water.  Fill the rest of the way with reagent grade water to the full mark on the 1liter flask.

5.    Invert flask ten times.  Let set for 10 minutes.

6.    Weigh 1 of the 10 remaining filters on calibrated scale, noting the initial weight of the filter in grams.

7.    Place the filter on filter apparatus. 

8.    Turn on vacuum pump.

9.    Rinse filter with 20 ml. of reagent grade distilled water.

10.    After 10 minutes invert flask ten more times and pour immediately into 100 ml. cylinder 100 ml. of standard from the 1-liter flask.

11.    Pour the 100 ml. of standard from the cylinder over the filter and rinse inside of cylinder and filter apparatus with reagent grade water over the filter.

12.    Repeat step 15 (Dry and weigh filter)

13.    Filter should show a 75mg/l of total suspended solids if procedures were followed.

14.    Calculation:  Same as previous calculation with the variable (C) still at 100 ml. 

E.    Conduct Influent Sampling and Testing:

1.    Collect a grab sample of 1 liter from the Influent of the Wastewater Treatment plant.

2.    Set out three filters of the nine remaining filters in order to run three separate replicate tests from the 1-liter grab sample.  This will ensure consistency of tests.

3.    Each replicate will be a 10 ml. sample using a 10 ml. pipette rinsed with distilled water.  Between each replicate shake the sample 25 times by inverting the 1 liter sample container.

4.    Calibrate scale with calibration weights.

5.    Weigh one of the three filters on scale for initial filter weight.

6.    Set up filter on filtration apparatus.

7.    Turn on vacuum pump.

8.    Rinse with distilled water – 20 ml.

9.    Shake by inverting 1 liter sample container 25 times.  

10.    Immediately pipette with a 10 ml. pipette 10 ml of sample using a suction bulb to suck up sample from the 1 liter sample container.

11.    Empty pipette over filter while rinsing inside of pipette and filtration apparatus with distilled water over filter.

12.    Run vacuum pump until sample and rinse water has filtered through filter.

13.    Repeat step 15 (Dry and weigh filter) 

14.    Calculation same as previous calculations with the exception of (C) sample size being 10 ml. instead of 100 ml.  This will equal 1 total suspended solids result in mg/l. for the three replicate tests to be performed.

15.    Place this same filter into the aluminum tin.

16.    Place tin containing filter in muffle furnace at 550 degrees C for twenty minutes.

17.    After twenty minutes, place the tin containing the filter into desiccator until filter temperature has stabilized, usually thirty minutes.

18.    Calibrate scale with calibration weights.

19.    Take filter out of desiccator and remove from tin.  Tare scale.

20.    Place filter on scale and record weight in grams.  Remove filter, tare scale, and re-weigh to ensure less than 4% change from previous weight. Place filter in desiccator between weights.

21.    Calculation for volatile suspended solids.

a.    Weight of filter plus residue after drying.

b.    Weight of filter plus ash after ignition.

c.    Sample size (10 ml.)

d.    [(A – B) x 1,000,000] / C = volatile suspended solids in mg/l.

22.    Repeat this procedure for the two remaining filters for the Influent grab suspended solids test/volatile suspended solids testing.

23.    This will end up with three total suspended solids results that can be averaged together for one result measured in mg/l.

24.     This also will have three volatile suspended solids results that can be averaged together for one result measured in mg/l.

25.    This will result in the total suspended solids make of organic and inorganic solids in one 1 liter influent grab sample.

F.    Conduct Effluent Sampling and Testing:

1.    Collect pick up a grab sample of 1 liter from the Effluent outfall of the Wastewater Treatment plant, which empties into the Selah ditch.

2.    Set out three filters of the six remaining filters in order to run the separate replicate tests from the 1 liter grab sample.  This will ensure consistency of tests.

3.    Each replicate will be 100 ml. sample using a 100 ml. cylinder rinsed with distilled water.  Between each replicate shake the sample 25 times by inverting the 1 liter sample container.

4.    Use the same procedures as the Influent grab sampling and test. *Exception:  100 ml. of sample use.  Remember this in the calculations. 

5.    The result will show the average of three Total suspends solids tests with a result measured in mg/l.  I will also have an average of three volatile suspended solids tests with a result measured in mg/l.

6.    To prove the first hypothesis use a percent reduction formula.

7.    Average Total suspended solids (Influent).

8.    Average Total suspended solids (Effluent).

9.    [(A – B)/A] x 100 =% Total suspended solids reduction.

10.    This will help prove that the wastewater Treatment clarification process is adequate and functioning properly.

G.    Conduct Yakima River testing upstream of the Selah ditch discharge.

1.    Collect a grab sample of 1 liter from the Yakima River upstream of the Selah ditch discharge.

2.    Set out the three remaining filters in order to run three separate tests from the 1 liter grab sample.  This will ensure consistency of tests.

3.    Each replicate will be a 100 ml. sample using a 100 ml. cylinder rinsed with distilled water.  Between each replicate I will shake the sample 25 times by inverting the 1 liter container.

4.    Use the same procedures as the Effluent sampling and testing.

5.    100 ml. will also be used for sample size in calculation.

H.    The result will show the average of three Total suspends solids tests with a result measured in mg/l.  I will also have an average of three volatile suspended solids tests with a result measured in mg/l.

I.    To prove the second hypothesis I will compare the Selah Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent outfall data to the data obtained from the Yakima River test data. 

 
Results

The first original purpose of this experiment was to compare the water clarity (total suspended solids) before and after wastewater treatment.

The second original purpose of this experiment was to compare the treated water clarity (total suspended solids) after treatment to that of the river water it would flow into.

The results showed that the average total suspended solids of the influent water (before treatment) was 177.8 milligrams/liter.  The average total suspended solids of the effluent water (after treatment) was 7.1 milligrams/liter.  The average percentage reduction in suspended solids was 96.0%.  The average total suspended solids of the upstream water (natural river) was 5.2 milligrams/liter.  

CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was the percent reduction of the total suspended solids of untreated wastewater to that of the treated wastewater would be 85% or greater.  

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted, because the average reduction was 96%.

My second hypothesis was that the treated wastewater would have a total suspended solids content that was no more than 50% greater than the Yakima River upstream of the wastewater entry point.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted, because the effluent was 37% higher than the river water.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if testing during spring, summer, or fall would provide similar results to my winter tests. I also wonder how the temperature of the effluent compares with the river.

If I were to conduct this project again there would be a change in the upstream river location. I would have started my experiment a little earlier to get more weeks of data.


Researched ---- Megan L


Read More

Four Common Types of Domestic Water on the Growth of Soybeans




PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effect of four common types of domestic water on the growth of soybeans: chlorinated municipal water, un-softened well water, potassium salt softened water, and sodium salt softened water.

I became interested in this idea because every summer I helped my mom water our plants.  She always told me not to water them with our softened, chlorinated water.  I often wondered what would happen.     

The information gained from this experiment could be very useful to gardeners and farmers who irrigate with domestic water.  It would help them decide which type of water to use (or avoid) to help their plants grow best.  


HYPOTHESIS

My first hypothesis was that the potassium salt softened water would result in the most plant growth in mass.

My second hypothesis was that the potassium salt softened water would result in the most plant growth in height. 

My third hypothesis was that the sodium salt softened water would result in the least plant growth in mass.  

My fourth hypothesis was that the sodium salt softened water would result in the least plant growth in height.  

My fifth hypothesis was that the un-softened well water would result in less soybean growth in mass than potassium salt softened water, but more than the chlorinated water.

My sixth hypothesis was that the un-softened well water would result in less soybean growth in height than potassium salt softened water, but more than the chlorinated water.

I based my first and second hypotheses on information I collected from the Morton Salt website.  The website stated, “Potassium is one of the 16 elements necessary for plant growth. It also helps plants resist disease and optimize moisture utilization.”

I based my third and fourth hypotheses on information I found from Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences.  In their website they stated, “Calcium and magnesium compounds are the components that make water hard. They are important nutrients for plants and sodium is not. Softened water can also affect the soil structure for a potted plant.”

I based my fifth and sixth hypotheses on information I found at a website created by Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences.  They stated, “If there is a source of un-softened water, use that water for your plants.  If you have a faucet in your water line before the water softener, you can also use that tap as the source of un-softened water for your plants.”


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

•    Date planted

•    Depth planted in the soil

•    Amount of water given to plants at any one time

•    Amount of soil in each planting cup (1/4 of a cup)

•    Type of soil

•    16 hours of light for all plants 

•    Distance of light above soil

The manipulated variable was the type of water used on the soybeans.  

The responding variables were height and mass of the soybeans. 

To measure the responding variables I used a centimeter ruler to determine height and a triple beam balance to measure biomass.    


MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
3cc. Syringe
2       
Planting trays with 72 individual soil cells
1
Bag of potting soil
1
Automatic Timer Switch
4 Liters           
Well water (un-softened)
Plastic Containers for the four types of water
4 Liters           
Potassium salt softened water
4 Liters 
Sodium salt softened water
4 Liters        
Chlorinated water (un-softened)
1
Triple Beam Balance
                         
                                                                                                          
PROCEDURES

1.    Fill all 72 individual cells in a divided planting tray with potting soil.

2.    Repeat step 1 using another tray.  So you should have 2 trays altogether

3.    Plant one soybean one centimeter deep in the soil in each cell.

4.    Divide the plant holders into four groups of 36.

5.    Make labels (Sodium, Potassium, Chlorinated, and Un-softened well water) one for each of the four sections.

6.    Water the soybeans with the 3cc syringe but water them with 5cc of water.  Use only the type of water for that group.

7.    Put the transparent cover on top of the plant holders to act as a mini green house.

8.     Every day, leave the lights on for 16 hours.

9.    After 16 hours of light turn off the lights for 8 hours.

10.    Look at the temperature in the room and record it in a journal.

11.    Once the sprouts have grown so big that they touch the plastic covers, remove the covers.

12.    Repeat step 5, except this time instead of using 5cc of water use 3cc.

13.    If there are any sprouts, count them and record the amount. 

14.    Repeat steps 6-14 until the experiment is complete.

15.    Once the experiment is finished, uproot each plant one section at a time.

16.    Rinse off the plant roots until there is no dirt on them.

17.    After all the dirt has been removed, measure the height of each plant
with a tape measure.  Make sure to measure in centimeters.

18.    Record the heights.  Add up all the measurements and divide the total by how many plants there are to get an average height.  Round to 1 decimal place.

19.    Now, place one of the four groups on a triple beam balance to find the biomass of the watering group.

20.    Divide the total weight (in grams) for the group by how many plants there are in the group.  That will be the average.  Round to 2 decimal places.

21.    Repeat 19-20 with each of the 3 remaining groups.


RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the effect of four common types of domestic water on the growth of soybeans: chlorinated municipal water, un-softened well water, potassium salt softened water, and sodium salt softened water.

The results of the experiment were that the sodium salt soybeans grew the most plants.  But the potassium salt soybeans had the greatest average in growth.  The un-softened well water soybeans resulted in the least plant growth.  The potassium soybean group weighed the most and the chlorinated water weighed the least.     


CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was that the potassium salt softened water would result in the most plant growth in mass.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted, because potassium water did result in the most plant growth in mass. 

My second hypothesis was that the potassium salt softened water would result in the most plant growth in height.

This hypothesis should be rejected, because it turned out that un-softened well water resulted with the most plant growth in height.  Potassium salt softened watered soybeans had the second to the most soybean plants. 

My third hypothesis was that the sodium salt softened water would result in the least plant growth in mass. 

This hypothesis should be rejected, because the sodium softened watered soybeans had the second to the most mass. 

My fourth hypothesis was that the sodium salt softened water would result in the least plant growth in height.

This hypothesis should be rejected, because sodium salt softened water had the second to the least average of heights.    

My fifth hypothesis was that the un-softened well water would result in less soybean growth in mass than potassium salt softened water, but more than the chlorinated water.

This hypothesis should be accepted, because un-softened well water was less then potassium and more then chlorinated water.

My sixth hypothesis was that the un-softened well water would result in less soybean growth in height than potassium salt softened water, but more than the chlorinated water.

This hypothesis should be rejected, because un-softened well water resulted in the most plant growth in height.

 After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if I used a different type of plants like tomatoes or ornamental flowers would the outcome be the same?  I wonder if I used a more concentrated potassium salt solution or a more concentrated sodium salt solution would the outcome be the same? 

If I were to conduct this project again I would definitely make sure the soybeans had more light, preferably sunlight during the summer.  I’d use far more plants in each group.  I’d test the water to make sure it actually had some potassium or sodium salt dissolved in it.  I’d also grow the plants for many more weeks. 



Researched by ---  Josh M   


  
Read More

Projectile Weight VS Distance Traveled



PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine how the mass of a projectile would affect distance traveled. 

I became interested in this idea when I saw a man using a trebuchet to launch cars and pianos, and I wondered how far I could launch something out of a catapult.

The information gained from this experiment could be useful to the army, hunters, sport players, etc. The information would be useful to anybody who is involved in propelling a projectile far distances. 


HYPOTHESIS

My original hypothesis was that the projectile will go the farthest with the smallest amount of weight.


EXPERIMENT DESIGN


The constants in this study were: 

•    Trebuchet catapult

•    Angle of catapult

•    Location for launch 

•    String used to launch washers

The manipulated variable was the mass of the projectile.


The responding variable was the distance the catapult shot the projectile.

To measure the responding variable, I used a metric tape measure. 


MATERIALS


QUANTITY  
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
Trebuchet Catapult
1/2 in. washers
1
Metric tape measure
1   
22.86cm string


PROCEDURES

1.    Gather trebuchet catapult parts and all of the materials.

2.    Assemble trebuchet catapult. 
 
3.    Set up catapult on flat ground.

4.    Load the catapult with one of the washers.

5.    Launch the projectile.

6.    Measure how far the projectile was launched with a metric tape measure.

7.    Record the information.

8.    Repeat steps 4-7 nine more times using the same weight projectile.

9.    Repeat steps 4-8 with a different weight washer and then another after that.


RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine how the mass of a projectile would affect distance traveled. 

The results of the experiment were that adding more and more weight each time reduced the distance the washers traveled by about half of the trial before.


CONCLUSION

My original hypothesis was that the projectile will go the farthest with the smallest amount of weight.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted because the 16.4-gram weight, the lightest used, flew the farthest.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if the length of string that is used to hold the projectile would matter when the projectile is fired.

If I were to conduct this project again I would do a similar experiment but with many more trials and a bigger catapult.



Researched by  ---- Avery  M



Read More
Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us
Copyright © 2017 www.sciencefairprojects.in | All Rights Reserved. Design By Templateclue