Different Colored Bird Feeders On How Much Seed Wild Birds Eat

  


PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine how birdfeeder color affected the amount of seed eaten by birds.

I became interested in this idea because every winter when it got cold I put birdseed out for the birds and I wanted to find out how to make more birds come to my feeders. I thought the color of the feeder might matter.

The information gained from this experiment could affect anyone who wanted birds in their yard, or wanted to feed birds in the winter. People who work for the Department of Fish and Wildlife might also be interested.

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that the green feeder would attract the most birds. 

I based my hypothesis on the conclusion of another student scientist’s experiment from 1998, “To What Color Bird Feeders are Birds Most Attracted?” Carrie Shramm, the experimenter, concluded that the green feeder did attract the most birds.

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

•    Type of feeders used

•    Space between feeders

•    General location of feeders

•    Scale used to weigh the feeders 

•     Kind of birdseed 

•    Amount of birdseed in each feeder

•    Number of feeders used

•    How long the feeders are available to the birds 

The manipulated variable was the color of the feeders.

The responding variable was the mass of the birdseed eaten.  

To measure the responding variable, the mass of birdseed in each feeder was determined every two days for three weeks using a triple beam balance scale when full and when partially emptied by birds.

MATERIALS
QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
5
Birdfeeders
4
Cans of spray paint(red, green, silver, blue)
1
Triple beam balance scale
5
Bag of birdseed
1
Roll of masking tape
4
Hooks to hang the feeders

   PROCEDURES


1)    Paint Feeders

a) Using cans of spray paint, paint each feeder a different color

•    One feeder painted red

•    One feeder painted green

•    One feeder painted blue

•    One feeder painted silver

•    One feeder unpainted

b) Be sure to get NO paint near the seed slots in the feeders, where the birds actually eat 

c) Feeders do NOT have seed slots that the birds could peck, accidentally eating paint

d)    Drill in screws to hang feeders 0.61 meters apart

2) Fill seed to very top of feeder

a)    Use clean, dry, fresh wild bird seed purchased from Petsmart

b)    Weigh each feeder in grams using a triple beam balance scale

c)    Record full weight data

3) Put feeders out for 2 days

a)     Hang each feeder on hook

•    Red feeder on first hook

•    Green feeder on second hook

•    Blue feeder on third hook

•    Silver feeder on fourth hook

•    Clear feeder on fifth hook

b)    Keep each feeder out from about 2:30 p.m. one day to about 2:30 p.m. two days later

4) Bring feeders inside to weigh after 2 days

a)    Use triple beam balance to weigh each feeder, record the mass 

b)    Refill feeders, reweigh, and record full feeder weight

5) Replace Feeders outside

a)    Rotate feeders on the hooks, moving each feeder over 1 space to the right.  For example, to replace the feeders for the first time do the following:

•    Clear feeder on first hook

•    Red feeder on second hook

•    Green feeder on third hook

•    Blue feeder on fourth hook

•    Silver feeder on fifth hook

6) Repeat steps 2-5 for 2 weeks

a) After 2 weeks, average the weights of each color feeder

7) Subtract ending mass from full mass for each trial

8) After 2 weeks, average the weights of each color feeder

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine how birdfeeder color affected the amount of seed eaten by birds.

The results of the experiment was the birds ate most out of the red feeder, then the red feeder with an average mass of 517.6 grams, then the green  feeder with 516.5 grams, then the blue feeder with 502.7 grams , then the silver feeder with 495.1 grams, and they ate the least out of the clear feeder with 474 grams. 

CONCLUSION

My original hypothesis was that the green feeder would attract the most birds.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected, because the birds ate slightly more out of the red feeder  than the green feeder.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if the location of the feeders matters.

If I were to conduct this project again I would make sure the birds already knew where the feeders were so they would start coming right away. I would also use better outdoor spray paint on the feeders. My feeders may not have been the best kind to use. I’d try to find better ones.  


 Researched by  ------ Whitney B

Read More

Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Types of Furnace Air Filters




PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effectiveness of three different types of air filters used in furnaces. 

I became interested in this idea when I learned that some types of air filters were supposedly better than others. I also have two cousins with asthma. It made me wonder if the more expensive types would filter more pollen and dust to help lessen the chance for them to have an attack. I wanted to see if paying for so-called “better” filters was worth the extra money.

The information gained from this experiment could help people with asthma, or other allergies, and possibly save people money depending on the outcome.

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that the 3-M brand filter would filter more particulate mass from the air.

I based my hypothesis on the “Filtrete’s” packaging graph. The graph shows that the Filtrete micro allergen filter catches the most particulate.

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

•    The homes used in the study.

•    The time the air filters were left in the house.

•    Method for weighing filters.

•    Use of plastic bags to keep filters uncontaminated during storage.

The manipulated variable was the type of air filter used.

The responding variable was the mass of particles collected in the filter.

To measure the responding variable, I used a triple beam balance to weigh the unused filter before putting it into the home, and again after 3 weeks of use. The difference was the amount of particulate collected.

MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1(box)
White garbage bags
1
Mask (to avoid inhaling any dust)
1
Triple beam balance
1
Pair of latex gloves (to keep dust off hands)
3
Dirt Demon Dust Shield Air Filters
3
American Air Filters
3
Filtrate Air Filters

PROCEDURES

1.    Find 6 home furnaces available for use during testing.

2.    Purchase the same 3 types of filters for each of the 6 furnaces.

3.    Weigh each filter using a triple beam balance.

4.    Write initial mass on each filter using a permanent marker.

5.    Put the filter into a clean plastic bag.

6.    Label bags with permanent marker (name, install date, remove date, size, and return in bag).

7.    Create a rotation schedule to insure that each type of filter gets used for 3 weeks in each furnace on a staggered basis.

8.    Rotation schedule as follows

Houses    Install 11/12 remove 12/3    Install 12/3 remove
12/24    Install 12/24 remove 1/14

 A
$$ 
$$$
B
$$$
$$
C
$$
$$$ 
$
D
$
$$  
$$$
E
$$$  
$$
F
$$
$$$  
$

9.    Install filters in furnaces (see rotation schedule).

10.    Leave filters in running furnaces for three weeks. 

11.    Collect used filters.

12.    Put filter back in labeled bag.

13.    Install next filter to be used in each of the 6 furnaces (see rotation schedule).

14.    Weigh filters using a triple beam balance.

15.    Calculate difference from initial mass (record).

16.    Repeat steps 10-15 with next filter in schedule for each furnace.

17.    Leave filters in running furnaces for three weeks.

18.    Collect filters.

19.    Put filters in labeled bags.

20.    Weigh filters using a triple beam balance.

21.    Calculate difference from initial mass (record).

22.     Average mass for each type of filter.

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was the purpose of this experiment was to compare the effectiveness of three different types of air filters used in furnaces. 

The results of the experiment were for the American Air Filter average particulate collected was 1.68g, the Dirt Demon Dust Shield’s average was 2.18g, and the Filtrate Air Filter’s average was 3.49g. 

CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that the 3-M brand “Filtrete” filter would filter more particulate mass from the air.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted, because the 3-m brand air filter, overall, collected the most particulate the brands tested.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if I were to conduct this experiment in a drier or damper area, would the results be the same?

If I were to conduct this project again I would conduct it in the summer so there would be more dust, pollen, and other particulate to be filtered so a bigger difference in the weight would be present. I would also use more furnaces and do more tests. I’d leave the filters in longer, at least a month, maybe five weeks. My results showed some strange and inconsistent values. I would redo my experiment with much greater care taken when weighing the filters and recording scores.



Researched by ----- Cassidy B

Read More

Densities of Various Solutions vs Plastic Separation




PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to find a way to separate different types of plastics by their densities.

I became interested in this idea because I might want to be involved in the plastics industry later in life. Lots of people I know (including my dad) work with plastics. I also think there could be much better methods regarding separation recycling of plastics. Recycling is very important because it’s an important way to minimize pollution. 

The information gained from this experiment could affect the world by not putting recyclable plastics to waste, by finding a more efficient way to separate different plastics.

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that varying the density of the liquid bath could effectively separate at least 90% of the six major polymers.

I based my hypothesis on information received from a website on densities of solids and liquids. The site showed simple ways to realize that anything with a greater density than H20 will sink in a water bath, and anything with a smaller density will float. I also based it on an article in Plastics Technology about the invention of plastics separation.   
  
EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

•    Sizes of pieces of plastics (1x1cm.)

•    Types of plastics: PET (polyethylene terephthalate), HDPE (high density polyethylene), PVC (polyvinyl/vinyl chloride), LDPE (low density polyethylene), PP (polypropylene) and, PS (polystyrene).

•    Room temperature

•    Water temperature

•    Oil temperature

•    Water Bath Sizes

•    The densities of the specific types of plastic

•    Salt in saline solution

The manipulated variable was the density of liquid bath. 

The responding variable was the percentage of the plastics successfully separated using the “float/sink” density method.  

To measure the responding variable, I simply counted the pieces of plastic recovered and identified successfully, and the ones not effectively separated, then found the percentage. 

                                               MATERIALS


QUANTITY

ITEM DESCRIPTION
Glass Water Bath
1x1cm Piece
Polyethylene Terephtalate
1x1cm Piece
High Density Polyethylene
1x1cm Piece 
Polyvinyl Chloride
1x1cm Piece
Low Density Polyethylene
1x1cm Piece
Polypropylene
1x1cm Piece 
Polystyrene
500 Milliliters
Water for water baths and solutions
1.8 Kg 
Sodium Chloride eventually added to water bath
375 Milliliters
Sunflower Oil


PROCEDURES

1.    Set Up The Experiment

            a)    Get polymers 1-6.

          b)    Cut plastic into squares that each are about 1cm x 1cm.

          c)    Get 3 containers for each solution.

          d)    Fill up the first container with 250 ml of pure water.

e)    Fill up one of the other two with 250 ml Sunflower oil and the other with 250 ml of more pure water. Add 10 grams of salt to the water and stir thoroughly. 

 f)    Make sure each different type of plastic is identifiable from others.

2.    Conduct the Experiment

a)    (During the experiment, write down the slightest things that happen and record all of the measurements.) 

b)    Put 2 pieces of each type of plastic into the saline solution, without getting anything into the solution besides the plastic.

c)    After putting the plastic into the saline solution, wait 1 minute and make sure none that are floating will sink and none that are sinking will float.

•    (While removing the floating plastics throughout the experiment, make sure that all of the water is removed from the plastic so it does not affect the density of the other liquid baths.)

 d)    Take the floating plastic out of the solution, leaving the sinking plastic, and put the pieces into the water bath. Stir thoroughly and wait 1 minute.

 e)    Remove the floating plastic from the water and put it into the sunflower oil.

            f)    Then, take the floating plastic out of the sunflower oil.

            g)    Repeat Step #2, three times

3.    Recording Data

   a)    Calculate how much of the percentage of plastic was separated successfully. (Meaning that it was a definite identification.) Write down anything unusual or unexpected that happens throughout the experiment.

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to find a way to separate different types of plastics by their densities.

The results of the experiment were, that 33% of the plastic was successfully separated. So therefore, the hypothesis was rejected. But, the experiment was still a success because now recyclers and plastic corporations will not falsely use the “liquid density separation” method by getting plastics mixed together.

CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that varying the density of the liquid bath could effectively separate at least 90% of the six major polymers, at the same time.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected, because the method only separated 33% of the six major polymers. Also, I believe that if a plastic or recycling plant specifically needed to separate 2 or even 3 different types of plastic, (unless they were extremely close densities like Polyethylene Terephtalate and PVC or, HDPE and LDPE) this method would work well. Even better if one plastic was less dense than water and the other more dense than water, then all you would have to do is dump the plastic into water then stir it up and skim out the ones that float, and the remove the ones that sink. That would work successfully.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if there is another liquid that I could have used instead of a salinity solution that is denser than water.

If this project was to be conducted again, there would be many important changes that would need to occur. There would need to be much more researching prior to the experiment. Also, there would need to be more trials with more plastics and more liquids. These would make the project much more successful. 


Researched by ----- Conner O


Read More
Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us
Copyright © 2017 www.sciencefairprojects.in | All Rights Reserved. Design By Templateclue