Deicer Salt on the Growth of Barley

Purpose :- :-

       The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of deicer salt on the growth of barley.

       I became interested in this idea when I saw people putting deicer on the roads and sidewalks in the winter. I wondered if the salt dissolved and got into the soil, would it affect how much plants grew. My family and I grew a garden, so salt in the soil could cause problems.  

        The information gained from this experiment could be of interest to gardeners, farmers, the Department of Transportation employees who salt the roads and homeowners who use deicer on their sidewalks and driveways. If salt damages plant growth, then this study could act as a warning. 

Hypothesis

My first hypothesis was that the barley plants with more deicer salt would grow more slowly than the plants without it.

My second hypothesis was that as the amount of deicer increased, the percent of surviving plants would decrease.  
       My third hypothesis was that as the amount of deicer salt increased, the weight of the plants would decrease.

       I based my hypothesis on an Internet article called “Sources of Soil Salinity”.  The article said that salt doesn't affect how plants grow much, unless a high amount of salt is present.

Deicer Salt - Science Fair Project Topics

Experiment Design

The constants in this study were:

•    The amount of water given to the plants (5cc)
•    The amount of soil in each cell
•    The type of soil
•    The amount of light given (14 hours a day)
•    The temperature the plants were grown at (20°C)
•    The type of plant seed (barley)
•    The depth of the plant seed (1 cm)

The manipulated variable was the amount of deicer salt used. 

         The responding variables were the growth of the barley and the survival rate. 

         To measure the responding variables, I measured the weight of the barley using a triple beam balance and counted the number that survived. 


Materials
Quantity
Item Description
2
Planting trays with 72 cells
1
Triple Beam Balance
432
Barley Seeds
1
Bag of potting soil
1
Bag of deicer rock salt
Tap Water
1
Growing Light
1
Syringe
2
Plastic Clear Domes
1
Timer
5
Plastic Jugs

                          
Procedures

1.    Planting seeds

A. Fill all of the cells in both planting trays 1/2 full with potting soil.

B. Add 15cc of water to each cell using the syringe.

        C. Place 3 barley seeds evenly spaced into each cell.

        D. Cover the barley seeds with a layer of potting soil.

        E. Add another 15cc of water. 

        F. Place a plastic, clear dome over each of the planting trays.

G. Set the timer for the fluorescent light to turn on for 14 hours every day and make sure the light is placed 30 centimeters above the soil.

2.    Label Groups

A. Divide up the cells so you have 3 groups of 24 cells in each tray (a total of 6 groups).

        B. Label the first group “no salt”.

        C. Label the second group “2.25 grams of salt”.

        D. Label the third group “4.5 grams of salt”.

        E. Label the fourth group “9 grams of salt”.

        F. Label the fifth group “18 grams of salt”.

        G. Label the sixth group “36 grams of salt”.

3.   Creating Saltwater Solutions

A. Put 2.25 grams salt into a plastic jug, add 1 liter water, label it “2.25 grams”.

B. Put 4.5 grams salt into a plastic jug, add 1 liter water, label it “4.5 grams”.

C. Put 9 grams salt into a plastic jug, add 1 liter water, label it “9 grams”.

D. Put 18 grams salt into a plastic jug, add 1 liter water, label it “18 grams”.

E. Put 36 grams salt into a plastic jug, add 1 liter water, label it “36 grams”.

4.    Experimental Treatments

A. Every other day add 5cc of salt solution to each cell using the syringe. Use the correct jug of water for each group.

B. At the end of the experiment, uproot and weigh all of the plants in each group using a triple beam balance. 

 C. Find the total mass for each group, then find the average mass for each group by taking the total mass for each group and dividing it by the number of plants in that group.

Results
The original purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of deicer salt on the growth of barley.

The results of the experiment were that the groups with more deicer salt weighed less than the groups with less deicer salt.

The group with no salt had an average mass of .25 grams.
The group with 2.25 grams of salt had an average mass of .23 grams.

The group with 4.5 grams of salt had an average mass of .20 grams. The group with 9 grams of salt had an average mass of .17 grams. 

The group with 18 grams of salt had an average mass of .12 grams. The group with 36 grams of salt had an average mass of .09 grams. 

The group with no salt had 100% surviving and the group with 36 grams of salt had 22% surviving.

Conclusion

        My first hypothesis was that the barley plants with more deicer salt would grow more slowly than the plants without it. 

       The results indicate that my first hypothesis should be accepted, because once the salt concentrations were applied, the groups with the higher amounts of salt grew the least. 

       My second hypothesis was that as the amount of deicer increased, the percent of surviving plants would decrease.

      The results indicate that my second hypothesis should be accepted, because once the salt concentrations were applied, the groups with more salt had fewer surviving plants.

      My third hypothesis was that as the amount of deicer salt increased, the weight of the plants would decrease. 

      The results indicate that my third hypothesis should be accepted, because the groups with the more deicer salt have a lower average mass.
        After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if a different type of deicer would affect how much barley grows. For example, the Department of Transportation sprays a special type of deicer on the roads. I wonder if that deicer would affect barley. Also, there are a lot of different types of plants that could be tested. I wonder if what the effect of deicer would be on wheat, soybeans, apple trees, or any other type of plant.

        If I were to conduct this project again I would have used six different syringes so I would have had one for each group, because the next time I watered the plants, some of the salt could still have been in the syringe from last time. I also would have grown the plants in natural sunlight outside in the summer instead of using an artificial light inside in the winter because that would be more natural. I also would have used more plants in each group and more variations of salt concentrations to discover the smallest amount of salt having a negative effect. 

 Researched by ----- Ashley B
Read More

Wind Speed, Air Humidity, and Air Temperature on Evaporation Rate

Purpose :- :- :- :- 

            The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effect of wind speed, air humidity, and water temperature on the evaporation rate of water.

            I became interested in this idea because I knew that water evaporation could be helpful when it cooled you down and harmful when it dehydrated both plants and people, so I decided to learn more about what affected evaporation. 

           The information gained from this experiment could help food producers who dehydrate fruit, vegetables, or meat.  It could also help coaches and athletes who need to keep cool during strenuous exercise, and people who are interested in outdoor activities, such as camping, hiking, or swimming.

Hypothesis

My hypothesis was that the temperature of the air would affect evaporation rate most.

        I based my hypothesis on a diagram I found in Young Scientist Encyclopedia.  The diagram showed that the warmer the water, the more molecules escaped as vapor.

         I also based my hypothesis on a slideshow I saw on the movie “Bill Nye the Science Guy: The Water Cycle.”  It showed that boiling water’s molecules have more energy and escape as vapor at a much faster pace than molecules at room temperature.

Experiment Design

The constants in this study were

•    The type of water (tap)
•    The amount of water 
•    The location the water is placed 
•    The size of the container
•    The ruler
•    The number of trials conducted
•    The type of the container
•    How long the water has to evaporate

        The manipulated variables were air humidity, wind speed, and water temperature.

           The responding variable was the amount of water evaporated in 150 minutes.  I measured the water in a graduated cylinder before and after the evaporation occurred.

          To measure the responding variable, I measured the water in milliliters before and after the evaporation occurred.

Materials
Quantity
Item Description
1
Small room fan
3
Liters tap water
5
Small dishes
1
Small air humidifier
1
100 ml. graduated cylinder
1
Humidity meter
1
Room thermometer
1
Lab thermometer
1
Plastic jug (approx. 4 liters)

 Procedures

1.    Collect materials.

        2.    Stabilize and maintain the humidity in testing room using a small air humidifier as needed.  For the first phase of testing, the humidity should be about 34%.

        3.    Stabilize and maintain the temperature in testing room.  For the first trials the room temperature should be 10º C.

        4.    Stabilize and maintain the air speed in testing room using a small fan as needed.  For the first trials the wind speed should be “dead calm”.

        5.    Place a jug of tap water in the testing room so it adjusts to the room temperature.  Whenever the water temperature is the same as the air temperature, the experiment can continue.

       6.    Pour 100 ml. of tap water from the jug at the current temperature into each of 5 identical small dishes using a graduated cylinder.

        7.    Place the dishes so they are being equally affected by room temperature, humidity, and air movement.

       8.    Using a timer, let the water sit in the testing room for 180 minutes.

       9.    Using a graduated cylinder, measure the water remaining from each dish and subtract each from the original 100 ml.

       10.    Record this as how many milliliters evaporated for that trial.

      11.    Repeat steps 4-10, except turn the fan on to its high-speed setting.  Be careful when placing the dishes that all are equally affected by the moving air.

     12.    Repeat steps 3-11, but stabilize and maintain the temperature at 20º C.

     13.    Repeat steps 3-11, but stabilize and maintain the temperature at 30º C.

       14.    Repeat steps 2-13, but stabilize and maintain the humidity at about 65%      for the entire series of trials.

Results

The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the effect of wind speed, air humidity, and water temperature on evaporation rate of water. 
           The results of the experiment were that wind speed affected evaporation rate most.  The difference between the two wind speeds evaporated water is 4.4 ml.

Conclusion

My hypothesis was that the temperature of the air would affect evaporation rate most.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected, because wind speed affected evaporation rate most.  The temperature of the air did not matter nearly as much as the wind speed and air humidity in the room when you are testing evaporation rate.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if the size of the room would affect how much water was evaporated.  Water in dishes set in a closet might evaporate very differently than in a gymnasium.  All liquids can evaporate but they do so at varying rates. It would be interesting to see what happens to a fast evaporating liquid like rubbing alcohol using my same procedures.

If I were to conduct this project again, I would do many more trials of each variation.  I would still use five dishes at a time, but I would do at least three different batches of five for each temperature, wind speed, and humidity condition.  I am sure that each evaporation trial should have been much longer, probably five to eight hours long.  That would have given a better idea of what happened with each condition.  It would also have been better to add an intermediate wind speed, about halfway between high and zero.

Researched by ------ Kaiti D
Read More

Different Detergents on Stain Removal from Cotton Cloth


PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effectiveness of different brands of detergent in removing stains from cotton cloth. 

I became interested in this idea when I got stains on my white cotton t-shirts. My mom washed them but the detergent she used didn’t always get the stain out.   T-shirts are expensive to replace and I wondered if I could find a better detergent.  

The information gained from this experiment would help homemakers, laundry services, hotels, hospitals, and others make better choices on which detergent to buy.

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that Tide would remove the test stains most effectively.

I based my hypothesis on the recent studies in “Consumer Reports” (October 2005, page 6) that showed Tide was the most reliable detergent/stain remover.

I also based my hypothesis on a study by Carrie Jo Nevue, a former 7th grade student.  She also tested detergents and concluded that Tide detergent worked the best.  Terri Bauman, a homemaker for 21 years, also believes that Tide Detergent works the best in stain removal.
  
EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:

•    The amount of detergent used (100 ml.) 

•    The temperature of water used 

•    The ingredients in the stain: Chocolate syrup, black coffee, purple grape juice, ravioli sauce, ketchup and mustard. 

•    The method of washing in-a washing machine.

•    The method of drying-in a drying machine.

The manipulated variable was the type of detergent.

The responding variable was whiteness of cloth.  

To measure the responding variable, I used a Hunter Reflectance Spectrophotometer (Colorimeter) to determine the “L” value (brightness.) 
   
MATERIALS
QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
Colorimeter
1
Washing Machine
1
Drying Machine
100 ml
Ketchup
100 ml
Mustard
100 ml
Purple Grape Juice
100 ml
Ravioli Sauce
1
Plastic Spatula
1
Large Mixing Bowl
100 ml
Tide
100 ml
All
100 ml
Arm & Hammer
48
10 x 10 cm squares of 100% White Cotton
1
Pair of Scissors
100 ml
Black Coffee
100 ml
Chocolate syrup
   
PROCEDURES

1.     Buy white 100% cotton fabric from a fabric store 

2.     Wash fabric three times in washing machine to remove factory treatment

3.    Lay out the material and cut the cotton into 49  10 cm X 10 cm squares
4.    Leave one 10 X 10 cm square of 100% white cotton fabric out from getting stained

5.    Label the squares 

a.    A.1-A.12 

b.    H.1-H.12 

c.    T.1-T.12 

d.    W.1-W.12

e.    White control (no stain)

6.     Prepare stain, mix well for five minutes:

a.     100 ml. of ketchup 

b.     100 ml. of mustard 

c.    100 ml. of purple grape juice 

d.    100 ml. of ravioli sauce 

e.    100 ml. of chocolate syrup 

f.    100 ml. of black coffee
  
7.    Stain the 48  10 cm X 10 cm squares 

a.     Let fabric soak for two days (wait for 48 hours before performing the next step)

b.    Let the stained fabric dry after taking out of the bowl

8.    Set the Washing machine to Permanent Press with cold water wash

9.    Wash cotton squares as followed: 

a.    T.1-T.12 with 100 ml. of Tide

b.    A.1-A.12 with 100 ml. of All 

c.    H.1-H.12 with 100 ml. of Arm and Hammer

d.    W.1-W.12 with Water (no detergent at all)

10.    When cycle is done carefully place in the drying machine (keep
the drying machine on the same cycle as the washing machine)

11.    Repeat step #8 and #9 with a different detergent for other three groups

12.    After all washing and drying is done take the material to Tree Top’s Colorimeter. 

13.    Carefully measure the “L” level of each piece of fabric under the Colorimeter

14.    Record results.

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to compare the effectiveness of different brands of detergent in removing stains from cotton cloth. 

The results of the experiment were that Tide’s “L” value was 81.49, Water Control’s “L” value was 79.40, All’s “L” value was 78.33, and Arm and Hammer’s “L” value was 78.98.  Tide with 81.49 was clearly the best.

CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that Tide would remove the test stains most effectively. 

My hypothesis should be accepted, Tide worked the best as shown by the Colorimeter.

After thinking about the results of this experiment, I wonder if any if the affect results:

•    Different type of cloth (silk, linen, and wool)

•    Washing temperature (cold vs. warm)

•    Amount of detergent used (would 1/2 work as well)

If I were to conduct this project again I would use more cloth samples.  I would only use one stain at a time.  One group would be stained with only one thing and be washed with one specific detergent.  

I would test more detergents, including Tide, All, Cheer, Arm and Hammer, and Kirkland Signature detergent.  

I would use the stains: butter, ketchup, mustard, purple grape juice, and black coffee.  I wouldn’t do the ravioli sauce and the chocolate sauce because they aren’t really things you eat on an everyday basis.  

I would also have one more control group, a stained cloth with no washing to show how much the stain had actually been removed.


Researched by ----- Michelle B 

Read More
Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us
Copyright © 2017 www.sciencefairprojects.in | All Rights Reserved. Design By Templateclue