Effect of Carbonated Water's Color Perception of Its Taste

  
PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether the color of carbonated water affected perception of its taste.

I became interested in this idea because I wanted to do something like a taste test. At first I was thinking about testing soft drinks.  Then I saw a project done by Krista Garcia in 2003 as a 7th grader. I knew it was exactly the kind of experiment I wanted to do. I decided to make some changes to her idea that might make it better.  My project is called “Drink color vs. Taste perception.” 

The information gained from this experiment will be useful to caterers, cooks, or anyone who is involved in food or drink preparation.

HYPOTHESIS

My first hypothesis was that color would affect the perceived taste of the flavored water.

I based my first hypothesis on previous research done by Krista Garcia. She stated,”...the color of the flavored carbonated water affected the reported taste.”

My second hypothesis was that the red food coloring would be most effective in misleading the perceived taste.

My third hypothesis was that lemon-lime flavored water would be most unaffected by misleading colors.


Experimental Design

          The constants in this study were:
  • The amount of carbonated water tasted (20ml)
  • Brand of flavored, sugar free carbonated water
  • Size, color, and type of tasting cup
  • Grade of subject
  • Temperature of carbonated water (7°C)
  • Location experiment took place
  • Experimenter interacting with subject
  • Type and amount of food coloring 
  • Procedures used
The manipulated variable was the color of the carbonated water.

The responding variable was the percentage of times subjects accurately identified the taste.  

To measure the responding variable I will count the number of correct responses.  

MATERIALS


QUANTITY

ITEM DESCRIPTION
1    
Box of gloves (latex free)
4 liters  
Unsweetened Carbonated Water, Lemon Lime flavored
4 liters  
Unsweetened Carbonated Water, Strawberry Flavored
4 liters  
Unsweetened Carbonated Water, Tangerine Flavored
500   
DIXIE cups  
Refrigerator that has a temperature of 7°C
Garbage can
30
Response Sheets
Box of Pens or Pencils
Pack of food coloring (Green, Orange, & Red)
One Liter Liquid Measuring Cup (that can measure 20ml)


PROCEDURES

1. Collect permissions slips before experiment is conducted (subjects may not participate without the slips.)

2. Create response sheet for subjects to use during tastings.

3. Prepare carbonated water:

a. Buy 4 liters of each flavor of sugar-free carbonated water at the grocery store (strawberry, tangerine, & lemon-lime) also buy 500 small drinking cups to serve carbonated water and food coloring with the colors of green, red, and orange or yellow.

b. Select one flavor of water to color. Into a one-liter bottle of this flavor add five drops of red food coloring.

c. Shake bottle gently for 12 seconds to spread the color.

d. Refrigerate bottle at 7°C  

e. Repeat steps b-d with another bottle of this same flavor but add the next food color in this list (green, red, or orange.)
f. Repeat step e until all 3 bottles of this flavor are different colors.

g. Repeat steps b-f with three bottles of the next flavor.

h. Repeat step g with each of the last flavor.

4. Move 6 desks in testing classroom so that none of the subjects can communicate or see each other’s paper.

5. Wash desktops.

6. Bring a group of 6 students into testing room and seat them

7. Read subjects the instructions and answer any questions.  Tell them they may quit at any time.

8. Give each subject a response sheet and a pencil.

9. Pourer and server must wash hands before serving liquids or touching cups and put gloves on.

10. Conduct trial using the Sampling Order table.

a. The pourer, who is hidden from the subjects, puts 20 ml. of the correct color and flavor carbonated water for this trial into 6 of the small sample cups.

b. Server (only) gives subjects the carbonated water. 

c. Tell subjects to taste it then mark on the response sheet the flavor they think the water is.  Make sure the response is marked for this trial and color.

d. Repeat steps 10 a-d until all four colors of water have been tasted for this trial.

11. Conduct the remaining three trials repeating step 10.

12. Thank the subjects and send them back to class

13. Collect response sheets and discard used cups.

14. Wash desktops. Wash hands.

15. Repeat steps 6-14 for the rest of the groups that you test.

16. Tally correct responses using Sampling Order sheet as a guide.

17. Average scores

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine whether the color of carbonated water affected perception of its taste.

The results of the experiment were that strawberry flavored water was correctly identified most (2.0 of 3.0 possible), and lemon-lime was the least often identified (1.6 of 3.0 possible).  The waters colored red were identified correctly least often (1.7 of 3.0 possible) and orange colored water was identified correctly most (1.9 of 3.0).

CONCLUSION

My first hypothesis was that color would affect the perceived taste of the flavored water. 

The results indicate that my first hypothesis should be accepted, but the difference is extremely small. 

My second hypothesis was that the red food coloring would be most effective in misleading the perceived taste. 

The results indicate that my second hypothesis should be accepted, because red colored water had the fewest correct taste identifications (so it was most misleading.)

My third hypothesis was that lemon-lime flavored water would be most unaffected by misleading colors.

The results indicate that my third hypothesis should be rejected because the strawberry flavor was identified correctly the most frequently.

Because of the results of this experiment I wonder how accurately people could identify the flavors with no coloring at all.  It is possible that these flavors are not easy to identify no matter what.  I am also interested in doing this test using adults compared to kindergarteners.  Really young kids might be more affected by the colors.

If I were to conduct this project again I would use all unsweetened carbonated water.  I would include many more subjects in my study. 


Researched by --- Cayley Rishor 


Read More

Robot Speed and Accuracy Using a Light and Touch Sensor




PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of various computer programs on a robot’s speed and accuracy.

I became interested in robots many years ago and now I want to know how they actually work. 

The information gained from this experiment might help factory owners and managers who use robotic devices to understand that a robot’s software makes a difference in its performance.

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that the touch sensor would have more speed and accuracy than the light sensor would.

I based my hypothesis on what it said in World Book Encyclopedia 1992.  Most robots use touch sensors to know when to stop without smashing something or not going far enough. 

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were: 

-Task robot was given
-Stopwatch used
-Location of experiment

The manipulated variable was the various computer programs. 

The responding variable was the time it took for the robots to do the tasks.

The responding variable was measured by timing the robot with a stopwatch.

MATERIALS                                                        

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
 1 
Light sensor
  1  
touch sensor
1
robot
 3 
robotic programmings
1
stopwatch 

PROCEDURES

1. Build robot using legos.

2. Equip robot with light sensor and the 5-step programming.

3. Make the robot do the task and time it with the stopwatch.

4. Record time it took to for robot to finish task.

5. Repeat step 2 using the 6-step programming.

6. Repeat steps 3-4.

7. Repeat step 1 using the 7-step programming.

8. Repeat steps 3-4.

9. Repeat step 2 using the touch sensor.

10. Repeat steps 3-8.
RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to find which type of programming would have better speed and accuracy.

The results of the experiment were that the light sensor did better than a touch sensor in both speed and accuracy.

CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that the touch sensor would have had more speed and accuracy than the light sensor could.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be rejected.

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if I were to try using a different kind of sensor such as weight sensors or pressure sensors and see which one would be better than the light sensor?

If I were to conduct this project again I would use more tasks and use more than 2 different sensors.  Also I have an idea about using 2 robots instead of one.  I would have used both of them at the same time and tried to find which of them would be faster and I think that timing them this way would be more accurate. 


Researched by ---- Boston P


Read More

PH Levels of Various Types of Soda Pop




 PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the pH level in various types of soda pop.

I became interested in this idea when I was drinking a soda and I wondered what caused its tart taste and acidy fizz. 

The information gained from this experiment could help consumers know what kind of soda pop to buy that won’t destroy their bone calcium and tooth enamel as much as others. 


HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that colas like Coca-cola or Pepsi would have lower pH than the other pops.


EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:
  • Temperature of pop
  • The amount of soda-pop in each container
  • The type of pH measuring meter
  • Container the soda is put in
  • How long the meter is put in the soda
  • Type of container the pop was held in

The manipulated variable was the kind of soda pop.

The responding variable was the pH level. 

To measure the responding variable I used a digital pH-measuring meter.

MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
3
12 oz. (355 ml.) Coca-Cola
3
12 oz. (355 ml.) Pepsi cola

3
12 oz. (355 ml.) Mountain Dew
3
12 oz. (355 ml.) Sprite
3
12 oz. (355 ml.) Orange soda
3
12 oz. (355 ml.) Root Beer
1
pH meter
1
Measuring cup (ml)


                                        PROCEDURES

1. Collect items for experiment.

a. Three cans each of Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Mountain Dew, Sprite, Orange soda, and Root Beer.

b. Digital pH measuring meter

c. Measuring cup (ml)

2. Label each group of three pops a-f.

3. Take a can from group A and measure out 100 ml. of the pop in a measuring cup.

4. Next put pH meter in the soda pop that’s in the measuring cup and wait for about ten seconds. After the numbers stop changing, read meter. Record data.

5. Triple test each can, so do this test two more times.

6. Repeat step 3 - 5 for the rest of the cans in-group A. 

7. Average the results for all the cans in this group.

8. Repeat steps 3 - 7 with another group like B.

9. Repeat steps 3 - 7 for the rest of the groups C - F.

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to find the pH levels in various types of soda pops.

The results of the experiment were that Root Beer had the highest pH at 4.24 followed by Sprite at 3.29 and Mountain Dew at 3.27.  The lowest scores were Orange at 2.90, Pepsi at 2.61, and the one with the lowest pH was Coca-Cola at 2.52. 

CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that colas like Coca-Cola or Pepsi would have lower pH than the other pops.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted because Coca-Cola and Pepsi had lower pH than all the other pops. 

Because of the results of this experiment, I wonder if the amount of carbonation would affect the amount of pH.  For example, if the pop was forced to be “flat” would that affect the pH.

If I were to conduct this project again I think I should use the reference solution for the pH meter more often to make sure it was still reading right during the experiment.

I also could have tested more brands of pop to tell the pH of other pops that people might like, for example Shasta pops and Sam’s Choice.

I should have tested different types of pop like Mountain Lightning, which is almost the same as Mountain Dew and I should have checked for a difference.



Researched by --- Marshal N


Read More

Effect of Alcohol Percentage in Gasohol on Engine Output




PURPOSE

The purpose of this experiment was to determine how the alcohol percentage in gasoline affected the power output of an internal combustion engine. 

I became interested in this idea when I talked to Chris Mottet about measuring the amount of power coming from an engine.

The information gained from this experiment could help people in the world know how much power their gasoline alcohol mixture will give them. It will help them make decisions about fuel efficiency.

HYPOTHESIS

My hypothesis was that as the alcohol content increased; the output per gallon would decrease.

 I based my hypothesis on an article on the Internet by David Ostlie who wrote about gasoline vs. ethanol. “On a volumetric basis ethanol yields 83,910 BTU’s/ gallon of thermal energy from combustion. Gasoline yields 124,800 BTU’s/ gallon of thermal energy. It becomes obvious that a dollar’s worth of gasoline will propel you 1.5 times farther than a dollar’s worth of ethanol.” 

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

The constants in this study were:
  • The engine
  • The generator
  • The type of gas
  • The ethanol
  • The load on the engine
  • The number of trials
The manipulated variable was the percentage of ethanol in the gasoline.

The responding variable was the power output of the engine. 

To measure the responding variable I timed how long a fixed amount of gasohol would power the engine.  

MATERIALS

QUANTITY
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
Generator w/ Engine
2400 ml
Gasoline
600 ml
Ethanol
1  Per Person
Pair of gloves
1  Per Person
Pair of glasses
1
Stop watch
1
Load
1
Measuring Cup
5
Cups for Gasohol


PROCEDURES

1. Put on safety glasses and gloves.

2. Create the five mixtures of gasohol in clean-labeled cups.

3. To create the mixtures you follow these rules. Make two of each batch for more accuracy. 

A. 10%= 30 ml ethanol + 270 ml gas= 300 ml of 10% ethanol mix.

B. 15%= 45 ml ethanol + 255 ml gas= 300 ml of 15% ethanol mix.

C. 20%= 60 ml ethanol + 240 ml gas= 300 ml of 20% ethanol mix.

D. 25%= 75 ml ethanol + 225 ml gas= 300 ml of 25% ethanol mix.

E. 30%= 90 ml ethanol + 210 ml gas= 300 ml of 30% ethanol mix.

4. Place the engine in a safe well-ventilated spot.

5. Make sure there is 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% written on the appropriate cups.

6. Prior to the first test put 300 ml of pure gasoline in and run dry. This is to preheat the engine to keep all of the tests the same temperature.

7. Pour 300 ml of gasohol into the engine.

8. Start the engine (with no load).

9. Make sure your load is on after you turn on the engine.

10. Perform the first experiment on the gasohol with 10% ethanol.

11. Clock how long it takes to run the engine under load until it runs out of gasohol.

12. Record the information you gathered from your experiment.

13. Perform the experiment using the same mixture two more times for better accuracy.

14. Do the experiment and follow numbers 8-14 for the rest of the gasohol mixtures.

RESULTS

The original purpose of this experiment was to determine how the alcohol percentage in gasoline affected the power output of an internal combustion engine.

The results of the experiment were that the mixtures of gasohol 10% through 25% did not make any difference compared to the gasoline (control.) When we got to thirty percent ethanol the output decreased by 25.6%.  
  
CONCLUSION

My hypothesis was that as the alcohol content increased; the output per gallon would decrease.

The results indicate that this hypothesis should be accepted, because when we got up to 30% ethanol there was a 25.6% decrease.

Because of the results of this experiment I wonder what the output per gallon would be on a specially modified engine that is made to take more alcohol than gasoline. I wonder if it would get better output per gallon than a regular gasoline engine.  

If I were to conduct this project again I would make my own modified gas tank. This would help me know that the engine burned the exact same amount of gasohol. I would also conduct more trials.

Researched by ---  Avery M




Read More
Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us
Copyright © 2017 www.sciencefairprojects.in | All Rights Reserved. Design By Templateclue